This report provides local authorities with a structured assessment of key delivery models for small‑scale heat networks, outlining their roles, risks and responsibilities across the project lifecycle.
Delivery models for small scale heat network deployment
This report provides local authorities with a structured assessment of key delivery models for small‑scale heat networks, outlining their roles, risks and responsibilities across the project lifecycle. Its findings help councils make informed, strategic decisions by comparing model suitability, highlighting enabling actions, and clarifying the pathways most likely to support effective, low‑risk heat network deployment.
The PANZ project aims to create a comprehensive platform that integrates technical, social, demographic, and economic data to develop effective Net Zero plans. Energy Systems Catapult (the Catapult) is supporting Peterborough City Council (PCC) to explore practical pathways for developing an emerging portfolio of small-scale heat networks, aligned with local decarbonisation objectives and wider place-based priorities.
To support this work, the Catapult has produced this delivery model suitability assessment to support PCC’s approach to small-scale heat network delivery.
This assessment includes:
- Stakeholder insights that highlight practical and commercial considerations for heat network delivery.
- An overview of the delivery models available to the Council, including its respective roles, responsibilities, and risk allocations.
- A comparative appraisal of each model against a defined set of evaluation criteria.
These insights are structured around three focus areas prioritised for their relevance in shaping a robust business case for future project delivery.
This report does not prescribe a preferred delivery model. Instead, it provides a structured, evidence-based assessment of each option’s risks, requirements, and suitability.
Although developed with a focus on Peterborough, the aim of the report is to support informed decision-making by highlighting the tradeoffs involved. As such, it provides useful inputs for all local authorities choosing a delivery approach aligned with their capabilities and ambitions for heat network deployment.